<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Things to Know Weblog &#187; Housing Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/category/housing-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog</link>
	<description>Orange County Coastal Area Real Estate Weblog – Who, What, When, Where &#38; How To</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Thornberg of Beacon Economics says ‘It’s a great time to buy a home’</title>
		<link>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2012/01/13/chris-thornberg-of-beacon-economics-says-its-a-great-time-to-buy-a-home/</link>
		<comments>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2012/01/13/chris-thornberg-of-beacon-economics-says-its-a-great-time-to-buy-a-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allan Heller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/?p=700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a recent gathering of real estate professionals, Chris Thonberg of Beacon Economics expressed his thoughts about the current state of the Orange County real estate market. He went into some detail about the economic factors which are improving to &#8230; <a href="http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2012/01/13/chris-thornberg-of-beacon-economics-says-its-a-great-time-to-buy-a-home/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a recent gathering of real estate professionals, Chris Thonberg of Beacon Economics expressed his thoughts about the current state of the Orange County real estate market. He went into some detail about the economic factors which are improving to cause the stabilization and upturn of the real estate market.</p>
<p>Below is a brief excerpt from his presentation.</p>
<p>You may read the Jeff Collins take on that conference by visiting the link at the bottom of this post.</p>
<blockquote><p>But Thursday, Thornberg said, “I’m probably the most optimistic that I’ve been about the economy in the last eight years.”</p>
<p>Thornberg cited a host of indicators pointing to improvement. Durable goods orders, industrial production, imports, exports, rail car loadings and hotel occupancy rates all are up. Home and consumer delinquency rates are down.</p>
<p>Commercial real estate vacancies have peaked and are starting to come down, he said.</p>
<p>Personal income in California is up 6.5 percent. Business inventories declined just as consumer demand took off, which will spur production. Hiring, a lagging indicator, is starting to heat up, and “that’s going to continue,” he said.</p>
<p>The threat from the Euro debt crisis is overblown, he maintained. At worst, it will cause a mild recession in Europe, which won’t be enough to bring down the world economy.</p></blockquote>
<p>From <a href="http://lansner.ocregister.com/2012/01/13/ex-doomsayer-its-a-great-time-to-buy-a-home/157105/">Ex-Doomsayer: ‘It’s a great time to buy a home’ &#8211; Lansner on Real Estate : The Orange County Register</a>.</p>
<p>Please let me know your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2012/01/13/chris-thornberg-of-beacon-economics-says-its-a-great-time-to-buy-a-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Anderson Forecast predicts a 49% home price increase within six years</title>
		<link>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/10/27/ucla-anderson-forecast-predicts-a-49-home-price-increase-within-six-years/</link>
		<comments>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/10/27/ucla-anderson-forecast-predicts-a-49-home-price-increase-within-six-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allan Heller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/?p=668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is an excerpt from an OC Register article which states that the most recent U.C.L.A. Anderson Forecast predicts a 49% increase in home prices over the next six years. UCLA: O.C. home prices to surge 49% October 27th, 2010, &#8230; <a href="http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/10/27/ucla-anderson-forecast-predicts-a-49-home-price-increase-within-six-years/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below is an excerpt from an <a href="http://lansner.ocregister.com/2010/10/27/ucla-o-c-home-prices-to-surge-49/86028/" target="_blank">OC Register article</a> which states that the most recent U.C.L.A. Anderson Forecast predicts a 49% increase in home prices over the next six years.</p>
<blockquote>
<div id="post-86028" class="post-86028 post hentry category-outlooks tag-trends tag-ucla-anderson-forecast">
<h3><a title="Permanent Link: UCLA: O.C. home prices to surge 49%" rel="bookmark" href="http://lansner.ocregister.com/2010/10/27/ucla-o-c-home-prices-to-surge-49/86028/">UCLA: O.C. home prices to surge 49%</a></h3>
<h4>October 27th, 2010, 1:00 am · posted by <a title="Posts by Jeff Collins" href="http://lansner.ocregister.com/author/jcollins/">Jeff Collins</a></h4>
<p>Orange County will have a half-million-dollar housing market again by 2012, and home sales volume will rebound by a whopping 43% over the next two years, according to the latest UCLA Anderson Forecast for the O.C. housing market.</p>
<table style="text-align: center;" border="1" cellpadding="3" align="right">
<caption><em>Orange County Forecast</em></caption>
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="orange">
<th> Year</th>
<th> Price</th>
<th> chg.</th>
<th> Sales</th>
<th> chg.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2010</td>
<td>$428,381</td>
<td>5.6%</td>
<td>32,139</td>
<td>3.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2011</td>
<td>$460,545</td>
<td>7.5%</td>
<td>40,974</td>
<td>27.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2012</td>
<td>$503,450</td>
<td>9.3%</td>
<td>45,877</td>
<td>12.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2013</td>
<td>$538,750</td>
<td>7.0%</td>
<td>48,832</td>
<td>6.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2014</td>
<td>$577,619</td>
<td>7.2%</td>
<td>49,913</td>
<td>2.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2015</td>
<td>$615,644</td>
<td>6.6%</td>
<td>47,800</td>
<td>-4.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2016</td>
<td>$639,650</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>47,577</td>
<td>-0.5%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Economists with UCLA’s Anderson Forecast foresee O.C. home prices climbing above $500,000 in 2012 for the first time since April 2008. Prices are expected to appreciate from 6.6% to 9.3% a year through 2015 — and, all told, grow 49% in the next six years.</p>
<p>By 2016, prices may be back to, or just under, the all-time highs reached at the pinnacle of the housing boom.</p>
<p>As for home sales, UCLA foresees transactions jumping 27.5 in 2011 and continuing to climb through 2014, almost reaching the boom-time levels.</p>
<p>“Expect a sluggish housing market for the remainder of this year and into next spring,” the forecast states. “At that time, pent up demand, rising affordability, and dissipating fear of a faltering economy should push sales higher.”</p>
<p>While UCLA forecasters don’t expect another recession, they believe that the recovery will be slow, calling the housing market recovery “fragile.”</p>
<p>In addition, there’s a wild card that could change the housing outlook for the worse, UCLA economists warned. If the shadow inventory of homes with delinquent mortgages should abruptly get pushed through the foreclosure process, “this would impact selling values,” the forecast states. [<a href="http://lansner.ocregister.com/2010/10/27/ucla-o-c-home-prices-to-surge-49/86028/" target="_blank">read more ...</a>]</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Individuals who have been waiting for the bottom of the housing market to purchase a home might consider now the perfect time to take advantage of the current low prices, low interest rates and abundant inventory.</p>
<p>What are your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/10/27/ucla-anderson-forecast-predicts-a-49-home-price-increase-within-six-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl E. Case (Case_Shiller housing index) says housing has never been a better bargin.</title>
		<link>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/09/07/karl-e-case-case_shiller-housing-index-says-housing-has-never-been-a-better-bargin/</link>
		<comments>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/09/07/karl-e-case-case_shiller-housing-index-says-housing-has-never-been-a-better-bargin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allan Heller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/?p=666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a quote from the September 1, 2010  New York Times article by Karl E. Case titled &#8220;A Dream House After All&#8221;.  Karl E. Case is a professor emeritus of economics at Wellesley and co-creator of Standard &#38; Poor’s &#8230; <a href="http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/09/07/karl-e-case-case_shiller-housing-index-says-housing-has-never-been-a-better-bargin/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a quote from the September 1, 2010  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/02/opinion/02case.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=1&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_blank">New York Times article</a> by Karl E. Case titled &#8220;A Dream House After All&#8221;.  Karl E. Case is a professor emeritus of economics at Wellesley and  co-creator of Standard &amp; Poor’s Case-Shiller housing index.</p>
<blockquote><p>This financial crisis has made us all too aware that we live in a Catch-22 world: the performance of the housing market drives the economy, and the performance of the economy drives the housing market. But housing has perhaps never been a better bargain, and sooner or later buyers will regain faith, inventories will shrink to reasonable levels, prices will rise and we’ll even start building again. The American dream is not dead — it’s just taking a well-deserved rest.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/02/opinion/02case.html?_r=3&amp;pagewanted=2&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">Op-Ed Contributor &#8211; A Dream House After All &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>What are your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/09/07/karl-e-case-case_shiller-housing-index-says-housing-has-never-been-a-better-bargin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newport Beach among states top home price gains</title>
		<link>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/07/30/newport-beach-among-states-top-home-price-gains/</link>
		<comments>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/07/30/newport-beach-among-states-top-home-price-gains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allan Heller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/?p=650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following OC Register article, based on information from DataQuick, outlines the recent housing price increases in the Newport Beach area.  Now might be a good time for those wishing to own a home in the Newport Beach area to &#8230; <a href="http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/07/30/newport-beach-among-states-top-home-price-gains/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following <a href="http://lansner.ocregister.com/2010/07/30/newport-among-states-top-home-gains/74633/">OC Register article</a>, based on information from DataQuick, outlines the recent housing price increases in the Newport Beach area.   Now might be a good time for those wishing to own a home in the Newport Beach area to start looking at the available inventory.</p>
<blockquote>
<div id="post-74633" class="post-74633 post hentry category-home-prices tag-california-association-of-realtors tag-newport-beach tag-trends">
<h3><a title="Permanent Link: Newport among state’s top home gains" rel="bookmark" href="http://lansner.ocregister.com/2010/07/30/newport-among-states-top-home-gains/74633/">Newport among state’s top home gains</a></h3>
<h4>July 30th, 2010, 12:01 am ·  posted by <a title="Posts by Jon Lansner" href="http://lansner.ocregister.com/author/jlansner/">Jon Lansner</a></h4>
<div>
<p>Newport Beach cracked the Top 10 list of California cities with the largest year-over-year home prices gains, based on changes in the <a href="http://www.car.org/newsstand/newsreleases/junereport/">median selling price as tracked by the California Association of Realtors</a>. June’s list …</p>
<ol>
<li>National City, up 59 percent</li>
<li><strong><span style="color: #993300;">Newport Beach, 52 percent</span></strong></li>
<li>Richmond, 52 percent</li>
<li>San Bernardino, 47 percent</li>
<li>San Pablo, 38 percent</li>
<li>Fairfield, 37 percent</li>
<li>Walnut, 34 percent</li>
<li>Colton, 32 percent</li>
<li>Imperial Beach, 31 percent</li>
<li>Poway, 30 percent</li>
</ol>
<p>CAR notes: “Large changes in local median home prices typically indicate both local home price appreciation, and often, large shifts in the composition of housing market activity.”</p>
<p>Statewide, CAR said the median selling price of an existing home rose 13.6 percent vs. June 2009. In Orange County, CAR had prices rising at a 6 percent annual rate.</p>
<p>Less of a surprise was that Newport was among the state’s priciest addresses. The Top 10 by median selling price in the state in June …</p>
<ol>
<li>Manhattan Beach, $1,737,500</li>
<li>Los Altos, $1,618,500</li>
<li>Saratoga, $1,425,000</li>
<li>Palo Alto, $1,308,500</li>
<li><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>Laguna Beach, $1,230,500</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>Newport Beach, $1,150,000</strong></span></li>
<li>Los Gatos, $1,045,000</li>
<li>Rancho Palos Verdes, $1,000,000</li>
<li>Cupertino, $980,000</li>
<li>Lafayette, $946,250</li>
</ol>
<p>One last bit of June trend trivia from CAR, an analysis by DataQuick that found, “232 of the 372 cities and communities reporting showed an increase in their respective median home prices from a year ago.”</p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>What are your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/07/30/newport-beach-among-states-top-home-price-gains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>June 2010 finishes with continuing strong sales in Orange County Coastal areas.</title>
		<link>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/25/june-2010-finishes-with-continuing-strong-sales-in-orange-county-coastal-areas/</link>
		<comments>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/25/june-2010-finishes-with-continuing-strong-sales-in-orange-county-coastal-areas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allan Heller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/?p=644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The OC Register article shown below indicates the Orange County Coastal areas continue to experience an improving housing market. Both prices and the number of sales have increased over last month and over last June. Home sales up in 59 &#8230; <a href="http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/25/june-2010-finishes-with-continuing-strong-sales-in-orange-county-coastal-areas/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://lansner.ocregister.com/2010/06/25/home-prices-up-in-54-o-c-zips/70571/" target="_blank">OC Register article</a> shown below indicates the Orange County Coastal areas continue to experience an improving housing market.  Both prices and the number of sales have increased over last month and over last June.</p>
<blockquote>
<h3><a title="Permanent Link: Home sales up in 59 O.C. ZIPs" rel="bookmark" href="http://lansner.ocregister.com/2010/06/25/home-prices-up-in-54-o-c-zips/70571/">Home sales up in 59 O.C. ZIPs</a></h3>
<h4>June 25th, 2010, 9:01 am . posted by <a title="Posts by Jeff Collins" href="http://lansner.ocregister.com/author/jcollins/">Jeff Collins</a></h4>
<div>
<p>For the 22 business days ending June 7	– DataQuick’s freshest stats — Orange County home buying patterns showed:</p>
<ul>
<li> Fifty-four	of O.C.’s 83 ZIP codes had gains in their respective median selling price. (Highlighted in green below!)	Overall, prices were up 7.1%	vs. a year ago.</li>
<li> Five	of O.C.’s ZIPs had median sales prices above $1 million in the period vs. 11 million-dollar ZIPs when the county median price peaked in June 2007. Since that pricing pinnacle, there’s been a 30%	drop in the countywide median price!</li>
<li> Fifty-nine	of O.C.’s ZIPs had year-over-year sales gains in the period.	Overall, sales were up 11.5%	vs. a year ago.</li>
<li>Thirty-seven ZIP codes had gains in both sales and prices.</li>
<li> Three	of O.C.’s ZIPs has sales gains of 100% or more in the period.</li>
</ul>
<p>Here’s a look at the 83 ZIPs and how they fared in terms of median selling price and total sales for this period:<span id="more-70571"> </span></p>
<table style="height: 1583px;" border="1" width="447">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="silver">
<th> Town</th>
<th> ZIP</th>
<th> Price</th>
<th> Yr. chg.</th>
<th> Sales</th>
<th> Yr. chg.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Aliso Viejo</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92656</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$419,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-0.2%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">121</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+49.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Anaheim</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92801</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$345,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+23.2%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">40</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-4.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Anaheim</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92802</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$329,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+7.2%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">28</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+21.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Anaheim</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92804</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$340,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+11.5%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">63</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-4.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Anaheim</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92805</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$316,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+3.6%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">51</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-36.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Anaheim</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92806</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$385,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+4.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">18</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+38.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Anaheim</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92807</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$467,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-2.1%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">35</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+0.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Anaheim</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92808</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$430,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-1.1%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">35</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+40.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brea</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92821</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$387,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-11.1%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">21</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+0.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Brea</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92823</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$755,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+31.6%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-80.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Buena Park</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">90620</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$400,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+2.6%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">57</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+3.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Buena Park</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">90621</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$361,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+25.5%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">22</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+37.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Corona del Mar</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92625</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$1,737,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+54.4%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">22</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+57.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Costa Mesa</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92626</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$519,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+3.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">32</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-5.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Costa Mesa</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92627</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$430,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-14.4%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">48</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+20.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cypress</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">90630</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$449,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-4.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">45</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+36.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Dana Point</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92624</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$552,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+0.5%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">16</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+45.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Point</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92629</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$563,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-24.4%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">49</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+25.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Foothill Ranch</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92610</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$245,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-45.6%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">17</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-5.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Fountain Valley</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92708</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$608,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+14.8%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">47</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+38.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Fullerton</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92831</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$436,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+7.7%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">21</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-34.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Fullerton</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92832</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$303,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+1.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">14</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+7.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Fullerton</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92833</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$370,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+2.8%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">78</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+50.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fullerton</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92835</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$440,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-19.3%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">24</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+20.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Garden Grove</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92840</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$340,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+7.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">53</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+1.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Garden Grove</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92841</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$355,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-6.6%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">29</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-19.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Garden Grove</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92843</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$320,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+6.7%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">34</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-12.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Garden Grove</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92844</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$315,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+22.3%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">30</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+42.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Garden Grove</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92845</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$480,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-0.8%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">12</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+71.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Huntington Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92646</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$539,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+7.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">62</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+3.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Huntington Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92647</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$529,250</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+10.3%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">36</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-10.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Huntington Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92648</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$775,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-2.5%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">52</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+4.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Huntington Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92649</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$510,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-2.5%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">32</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+10.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Irvine</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92602</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$610,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+6.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">35</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+16.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Irvine</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92603</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$977,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+28.6%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">36</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+12.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Irvine</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92604</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$545,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+10.2%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">24</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+4.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Irvine</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92606</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$412,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-26.1%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">23</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+15.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Irvine</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92612</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$475,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-8.7%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">43</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+79.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Irvine</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92614</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$557,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+2.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">23</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-14.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Irvine</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92618</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$630,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+44.5%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">76</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+261.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Irvine</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92620</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$740,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+8.8%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">54</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Ladera Ranch</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92694</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$557,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+8.3%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">64</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+25.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>La Habra</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">90631</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$360,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+26.3%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">66</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+53.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>La Palma</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">90623</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$541,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+3.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">16</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+60.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Laguna Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92651</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$900,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-22.3%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">40</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+11.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Laguna Hills</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92653</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$455,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+23.5%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">31</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-18.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Laguna Niguel</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92677</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$483,750</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-7.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">105</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+22.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Laguna Woods</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92637</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$170,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-27.7%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">27</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+42.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Lake Forest</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92630</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$439,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+20.3%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">74</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+39.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Los Alamitos</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">90720</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$664,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+2.5%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">18</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+20.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Midway City</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92655</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$351,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">8</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Mission Viejo</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92691</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$450,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+15.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">56</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+16.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Mission Viejo</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92692</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$574,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+12.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">69</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+21.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Newport Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92660</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$1,120,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+73.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">42</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+20.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Newport Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92661</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$1,620,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+17.8%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">9</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+125.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Newport Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92662</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$1,800,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Newport Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92663</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$882,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+47.1%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">28</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+86.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Newport Coast</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92657</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$1,849,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+19.2%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">26</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+52.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Orange</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92865</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$475,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+23.4%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">31</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+55.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Orange</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92866</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$442,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-5.2%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">9</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+12.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Orange</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92867</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$515,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+14.4%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">42</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+5.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Orange</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92868</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$375,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+11.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">15</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+15.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Orange</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92869</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$400,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-8.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">36</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-28.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Placentia</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92870</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$505,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+19.1%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">50</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+2.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ran.S. Margarita</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92688</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$348,750</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-5.7%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">90</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+21.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>San Clemente</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92672</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$572,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+8.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">41</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+13.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>San Clemente</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92673</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$622,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-2.4%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">57</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+67.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>San Juan Capo</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92675</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$419,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+24.5%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">55</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+77.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Santa Ana</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92701</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$190,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+58.3%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">29</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-40.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Santa Ana</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92703</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$316,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+43.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">32</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-46.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Santa Ana</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92704</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$297,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+16.7%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">78</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+41.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Santa Ana</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92705</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$625,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+101.6%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">48</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-7.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Santa Ana</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92706</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$397,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+21.2%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">22</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-21.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Santa Ana</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92707</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$255,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+13.3%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">52</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-27.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Seal Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">90740</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$719,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-0.4%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">22</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+29.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Stanton</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">90680</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$297,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+9.6%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">15</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-55.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Trabuco/Coto</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92679</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$552,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-16.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">43</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-27.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Tustin</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92780</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$410,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+59.2%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">50</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+16.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tustin</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92782</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$471,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-32.7%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">36</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-43.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Villa Park</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92861</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$908,750</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-30.1%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">10</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+100.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Westminster</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92683</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$432,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+8.8%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">78</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+2.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<td>Yorba Linda</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92886</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$630,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+12.1%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">70</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+32.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yorba Linda</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">92887</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$585,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">-10.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">31</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+40.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="orange">
<td>Total O.C.</td>
<td style="text-align: right;"></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">$450,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+7.1%</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3,349</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">+11.5%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>What are your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/25/june-2010-finishes-with-continuing-strong-sales-in-orange-county-coastal-areas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beach town home sales continue the upward trend</title>
		<link>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/13/beach-town-home-sales-continue-the-upward-trend/</link>
		<comments>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/13/beach-town-home-sales-continue-the-upward-trend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allan Heller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/?p=631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is an OC Register article which points out a continuing upward trend of the Orange County Coastal area housing market. Beach town home sales up 40% June 13th, 2010, 12:33 am · posted by Jon Lansner For the 22 &#8230; <a href="http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/13/beach-town-home-sales-continue-the-upward-trend/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below is an <a href="http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2010/06/13/beach-town-home-sales-up-40/68637/" target="_blank">OC Register article</a> which points out a continuing upward trend of the Orange County Coastal area housing market.</p>
<blockquote><h3><a title="Permanent Link: Beach town home sales up 40%" rel="bookmark" href="http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2010/06/13/beach-town-home-sales-up-40/68637/">Beach town home sales up 40%</a></h3>
<h4>June 13th, 2010, 12:33 am · posted by <a title="Posts by Jon Lansner" href="http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/author/jlansner/">Jon Lansner</a></h4>
<div>
<p>For the 22 business days ending May 25	– DataQuick’s latest stats — the 	17	ZIPs located in 	beach towns	communities showed …</p>
<ul>
<li> 587 	homes sold, that is 	+40.1%	vs. a year ago.</li>
<li> The median selling price of these ZIPs was	 $719,000 	– that is 	+7.1%	vs. a year ago.</li>
<li> The 	beach towns	ZIPs	comprised	18.5%	of the recent home sales in Orange County vs.	15.2%	a year ago.</li>
</ul>
<p>A little geographical context …</p>
<ul>
<li> 36	ZIP codes in 	beach towns and inland South County communities had	 1,523 	homes sales. That’s	up	38.6%	vs. a year ago.</li>
<li> 47	ZIP codes in 	mid-county and inland North County communities had	 1,657 	homes sales. That’s	down	0.4%	vs. a year ago.</li>
<li> Thus, the share of Orange County homes sold in mid-county and inland North County neighborhoods was	52%	vs. 	60%	a year ago.</li>
</ul>
<p>The ZIP-by-ZIP results for 	beach towns	communities …</p>
<table style="height: 83px; width: 500px;" border="1">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="silver">
<th> Town</th>
<th> ZIP</th>
<th> Price</th>
<th> Yr. chg.</th>
<th> Sales</th>
<th> Yr. chg.</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Corona del Mar</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92625</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$1,668,250</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+19.2%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">27</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+350.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Point</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92624</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$550,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-4.3%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">11</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+10.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Point</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92629</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$561,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-11.7%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">44</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+12.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Huntington Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92646</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$530,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+7.1%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">75</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+53.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Huntington Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92647</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$510,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+10.4%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">38</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+11.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Huntington Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92648</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$850,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+25.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">44</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-4.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Huntington Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92649</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$552,500</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-10.6%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">37</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+68.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Laguna Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92651</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$965,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-3.5%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">42</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+90.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Newport Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92660</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$1,000,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+15.5%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">47</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+51.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Newport Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92661</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$1,610,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+16.2%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">10</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+42.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Newport Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92662</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$1,800,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+0.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">7</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+133.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Newport Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92663</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$775,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+34.8%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">23</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+76.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Newport Coast</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92657</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$1,900,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+38.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">28</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+154.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>San Clemente</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92672</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$565,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+4.6%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">42</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+31.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>San Clemente</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92673</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$630,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-0.8%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">49</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+16.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>San Juan Capistrano</td>
<td style="text-align: right">92675</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$450,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+57.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">50</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+35.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Seal Beach</td>
<td style="text-align: right">90740</td>
<td style="text-align: right">$719,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+0.6%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">13</td>
<td style="text-align: right">-13.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="orange">
<td>Total O.C.</td>
<td style="text-align: right"></td>
<td style="text-align: right">$445,000</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+9.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: right">3,273</td>
<td style="text-align: right">+14.6%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>What are your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/13/beach-town-home-sales-continue-the-upward-trend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O.C. home prices continue to strengthen</title>
		<link>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/04/o-c-home-prices-continue-to-strengthen/</link>
		<comments>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/04/o-c-home-prices-continue-to-strengthen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 20:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allan Heller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/?p=615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Orange County home prices continue to strengthen according to the following OC Register article. O.C. home median price at 21-month high June 4th, 2010, 9:09 am · posted by Jon Lansner For the 22 business days ending May 18 – &#8230; <a href="http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/04/o-c-home-prices-continue-to-strengthen/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orange County home prices continue to strengthen according to the following <a href="http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2010/06/04/o-c-home-price-at-21-month-high/67891/" target="_blank">OC Register article</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>O.C. home median price at 21-month high</p>
<p>June 4th, 2010, 9:09 am · posted by Jon Lansner</p>
<p>For the 22 business days ending May 18 – DataQuick’s latest real estate buying report — Orange County saw …</p>
<table style="text-align: center; height: 102px; margin-left: 10px;" border="1" width="311" align="right">
<caption> For the 22 business days ending May 18 </caption>
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="lawngreen">
<th> Slice</th>
<th> Price</th>
<th> Yr. ago</th>
<th> Sales</th>
<th> Yr. ago</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Houses</td>
<td>$515,000</td>
<td>+15.7%</td>
<td>1,935</td>
<td>+7.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Condos</td>
<td>$295,000</td>
<td>+13.5%</td>
<td>926</td>
<td>+18.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>New</td>
<td>$640,000</td>
<td>+34.9%</td>
<td>195</td>
<td>+61.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="orange">
<td><strong>All O.C.</strong></td>
<td><strong> $440,000 </strong></td>
<td><strong> +12.8% </strong></td>
<td><strong> 3,056 </strong></td>
<td><strong> +12.8% </strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<ul>
<li> $440,000 	median selling price that is up 12.8%	vs. a year ago yet	-32%	below June 2007’s peak of $645,000.</li>
<li>A median of $440,000 was last seen in Orange County in August 2008.</li>
<li> The most recent median is  	19%	above the cyclical low hit in January 2009 at $370,000 — a current bottom that was 43%	below the peak.</li>
<li> The median selling price of an Orange County single-family home is 	30%	less than their peak pricing (June ‘07) while condos sell	37%	 below their peak in March 2006.	Builder prices for new homes are	26%	below their February ‘05 top.</li>
<li> Single-family homes were	75%	more expensive than condos in this period vs.	71%	a year ago. From 1990-2008, the average house/condo gap was 58%.</li>
<li> In this most recent period, Orange County shoppers bought	3,056	residences — that is 	+12.8%	vs. year-ago buying activity.	This current sales pace is 	85%	of the average 3,597 homes sold per month in the 20 years ended in 2009.</li>
<li> Builders’ new-home sales were	6%	of all Orange County residences sold in the period vs.	4%	a year ago. From 1990-2009, builders did 14% of the selling.</li>
</ul>
<p>via <a href="http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2010/06/04/o-c-home-price-at-21-month-high/67891/">O.C. home median price at 21-month high &#8211; Lansner on Real Estate : The Orange County Register</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What are your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/04/o-c-home-prices-continue-to-strengthen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newport Beach homes own the most zip</title>
		<link>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/03/newport-beach-homes-own-the-most-zip/</link>
		<comments>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/03/newport-beach-homes-own-the-most-zip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allan Heller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/?p=604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is an interesting OC Register article pointing out how the Newport Beach area housing market has improved over the last quarter. Newport Beach homes own the most zip June 3rd, 2010, 12:01 am · posted by Jon Lansner Newport &#8230; <a href="http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/03/newport-beach-homes-own-the-most-zip/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below is an interesting <a href="http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2010/06/03/newport-beach-real-estate/67703/" target="_blank">OC Register article</a> pointing out how the Newport Beach area housing market has improved over the last quarter.</p>
<blockquote><p>Newport Beach homes own the most zip</p>
<p>June 3rd, 2010, 12:01 am · posted by Jon Lansner</p>
<p>Newport Beach 92660  had Orange County’s zippiest housing market in the most recently concluded quarter.</p>
<p>So says our Zippy rankings that weigh pricing and sales momentum plus foreclosure frequency as measured by DataQuick stats.</p>
<p>This ZIP — running from Back Bay to around Fashion Island up to the toll road –ranked 7 of 83 for pricing; 2 for sales; and 6 in terms of foreclosures frequency in the community. In the previous quarter, this ZIP ranked 19 of 83 overall.</p>
<p>Second strongest was Newport Beach 92663 – from the pier to around the bay up to Hoag Hospital — followed by Irvine 92614 as third best. The beach theme in the Top10 also included Laguna Beach 92651 (#5); Newport Coast 92657 (#6); and Newport Beach 92661 — basically, most of the Balboa Peninsula (#8).</p>
<p>When you look at the 83 major ZIPs in the county and their Zippys rankings, you see these trends for the best-performing communities:</p>
<p>* The top 25 had a median selling price of $635,000 – that’s +35% vs. the middle of the pack.</p>
<p>* Price momentum of the top 25 — activity vs. a year ago was 17% compared to 8% for the middle of the pack.</p>
<p>* Sales momentum of the top 25 — activity vs. a year ago was 54% compared to 5% for the middle of the pack.</p>
<p>* Forecloures occurred in the top 25 ZIP at a rate of 1.4 homes per 1,000 vs. 2.6 for the middle of the pack.</p>
<p>* Forecloures momentum in the top 25 ZIP — change vs. a year ago — was 11% compared to -2% for the middle of the pack.</p>
<div style="float:clear"></div>
<table padding="5" style="float: right; width: 400px; text-align: center;margin-left:10px;margin-bottom:10px" border="1">
<tbody>
<tr style="background-color:orange">
<td>Rank</td>
<td>Prev.</td>
<td>Town</td>
<td>ZIP</td>
<td>Price</td>
<td>Pricing rank</td>
<td>Sales rank</td>
<td>FC rank</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>Newport Beach</td>
<td>92660</td>
<td>$1,126,500</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>42</td>
<td>Newport Beach</td>
<td>92663</td>
<td>$962,500</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>17</td>
<td>Irvine</td>
<td>92614</td>
<td>$495,000</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>51</td>
<td>Irvine</td>
<td>92618</td>
<td>$540,000</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>28</td>
<td>Laguna Beach</td>
<td>92651</td>
<td>$1,250,000</td>
<td>11</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>33</td>
<td>Newport Coast</td>
<td>92657</td>
<td>$1,686,250</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>45</td>
<td>Fullerton</td>
<td>92835</td>
<td>$570,000</td>
<td>32</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>Newport Beach</td>
<td>92661</td>
<td>$3,300,000</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>63</td>
<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>33</td>
<td>Irvine</td>
<td>92603</td>
<td>$830,000</td>
<td>16</td>
<td>24</td>
<td>28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>Orange</td>
<td>92866</td>
<td>$483,000</td>
<td>30</td>
<td>37</td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* At right is last quarter’s 10 zippiest ZIPs, as measured by Zippy math, and their respective rankings (1 best; 83 worst) in terms of pricing and sales momentum and foreclosure frequency.</p>
<p>* Two Santa Ana ZIPs finish last in Zippy rankings.</p>
<p>* See this coming Sunday’s Register for more analysis.</p>
<p>PS: What’s a Zippy?</p>
<p>* WHAT? Tally of 3 key home-market performance benchmarks: Pricing and sales momentum (year-over-year change) plus foreclosure density (per homes in neighborhood).</p>
<p>* WHY? All rankings need a nickname, thus, “Zippys.”</p>
<p>* HOW? Using DataQuick data for most recent quarter we rank the 83 ZIPs by price, sales and foreclosure — then determine overall ranking by each ZIP’s average ranking.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2010/06/03/newport-beach-real-estate/67703/">Newport Beach homes own the most zip &#8211; Lansner on Real Estate : The Orange County Register</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What are your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/06/03/newport-beach-homes-own-the-most-zip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Major hedge fund manager turns bullish on housing</title>
		<link>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/04/21/major-hedge-fund-manager-turns-bullish-on-housing/</link>
		<comments>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/04/21/major-hedge-fund-manager-turns-bullish-on-housing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allan Heller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/?p=592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the below excerpts from this article on MarketWatch, John Paulson is adjusting his investment strategy to take into account an improving housing market. By Alistair Barr, MarketWatch SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) &#8212; John Paulson, the hedge-fund manager famous for &#8230; <a href="http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/04/21/major-hedge-fund-manager-turns-bullish-on-housing/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the below excerpts from this <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/paulson-co-turns-bullish-on-housing-economy-2010-04-21">article on MarketWatch</a>, John Paulson is adjusting his investment strategy to take into account an improving housing market.</p>
<blockquote><p>By Alistair Barr, MarketWatch</p>
<p>SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) &#8212; John Paulson, the hedge-fund manager famous for betting against mortgage securities, is now bullish on the U.S. housing market and the economy.</p>
<p>During a conference call with investors Wednesday, Paulson said he was concerned earlier this year about a potential double-dip recession.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not concerned about that at all today,&#8221; he said. It&#8217;s more likely there could be a V-shaped recovery, Paulson elaborated.</p>
<p>House prices have stabilized and could climb 8% to 10% nationwide in 2011, he added.</p>
<p>Corporate earnings are coming in ahead of expectations, the stock market is stronger and there&#8217;s a &#8220;vibrant&#8221; credit market. With the &#8220;final leg&#8221; of a rising housing market, &#8220;the outlook for 2011 could be very strong,&#8221; Paulson said.</p>
<p>Paulson oversaw $32 billion in assets at the start of 2010, making it the third-largest hedge-fund firm in the world behind J.P. Morgan Chase &amp; Co.  and Bridgewater Associates.</p>
<p>The firm grew quickly after it made billions of dollars betting against mortgage-related securities before the housing market collapsed in 2007. One of those bets was against parts of a Goldman Sachs collateralized debt obligation called Abacus 2007-AC1.</p>
<p>Covering shorts</p>
<p>Returns generated by Paulson&#8217;s main Advantage hedge funds lagged some rivals in the first quarter. Paulson said Wednesday that this was because the firm kept its net exposure to the market low. This means negative bets, known as short positions, were relatively high compared to positive, or long, positions.</p>
<p>Paulson added he was concerned about a potential double-dip recession and a possible default by a Southern European nation. &#8220;I&#8217;m currently much less concerned that either those two issues will happen.&#8221;</p>
<p>Greece&#8217;s problems are much better understood now and are being dealt with, he commented.</p>
<p>Paulson &amp; Co. covered, or closed, many of its short positions recently and that showed up in stronger returns in April, the fund manager noted. The firm has been &#8220;much more aggressive&#8221; in positioning its Advantage funds to &#8220;participate in a stronger economic recovery,&#8221; Paulson said.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/paulson-co-turns-bullish-on-housing-economy-2010-04-21">Paulson &amp; Co. turns bullish on housing, economy Hedge Funds &#8211; MarketWatch</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What are your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/04/21/major-hedge-fund-manager-turns-bullish-on-housing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home buying up 52% at beach, south O.C.</title>
		<link>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/04/18/home-buying-up-52-at-beach-south-o-c/</link>
		<comments>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/04/18/home-buying-up-52-at-beach-south-o-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allan Heller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/?p=585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a short article from the OC Register indicating the improving housing market in the Orange County Coastal areas. Homebuying up 52% at beach, south O.C.April 18th, 2010, 7:58 amposted by Jon Lansner For calendar month March – freshest &#8230; <a href="http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/04/18/home-buying-up-52-at-beach-south-o-c/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a short <a title="OC Register" href="http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2010/04/18/homebuying-up-52-at-beach-south-o-c/62953/" target="_blank">article from the OC Register</a> indicating the improving housing market in the Orange County Coastal areas.</p>
<blockquote><p>Homebuying up 52% at beach, south O.C.<br />April 18th, 2010, 7:58 am<br />posted by Jon Lansner</p>
<p>For calendar month March – freshest numbers from DataQuick — our region-by-region analysis of homebuying shows Orange County slices up geographically speaking this way …</p>
<ul>
<li>DataQuick identified 704 homes selling in Orange County’s north-inland ZIP codes in this most recent period, +6% from a year ago.</li>
<li>Median selling price? $448,000 in these 23 ZIPs. This most recent median price change was +11.0% vs. a year ago.</li>
<li>Mid-county ZIPs — median selling price $347,000 – had 762 sales, -10% from a year ago. In these 24 ZIPs, the freshets median price change was +7.2% vs. a year ago.     Combined, total homes sales in ZIPs in the north and mid-section of Orange County were -2.7% vs. a year ago as homebuying the the rest of the county ran +51.6% vs. 12 months earlier.</li>
<li>North/mid-county homes accounted for 54% of residences sold in the most recent period vs. 65% a year ago.     460 homes sold in beach cities’ 17 ZIP codes in the most recent period, +47% from a year ago. Median selling price? $701,500 in these 17 ZIPs. Newest median price change was +14.5% vs. a year ago.</li>
<li>South inland ZIPs — median selling price $521,875 – had 785 sales, +54% from a year ago. In these 19 ZIPs, the latest median price change was +6.7% vs. a year ago.</li>
<li>All told, countywide sales were +9% vs. a year ago. The median selling price was +12% in the past year.</li>
</ul>
<p>via <a href="http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2010/04/18/homebuying-up-52-at-beach-south-o-c/62953/">Homebuying up 52% at beach, south O.C. &#8211; Lansner on Real Estate : The Orange County Register</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What are your thoughts? &#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oc-coastalproperties.com/weblog/2010/04/18/home-buying-up-52-at-beach-south-o-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic

Served from: oc-coastalproperties.com @ 2012-02-05 01:29:49 -->
